This whole Rubik's Cube record debate is like comparing apples to oranges. The Smart Cube records may be fast, but they're not playing in the same league as official stackmat solves. It's a whole different ball game. Plus, can we even trust these smart cube scrambles? It's like the wild west out there. 🤔 Ultimately, it's up to you to decide if they count or not. #SmartCubesVsStackmats

The Controversial Speed Cubing Record 🤔

What had everyone talking was the incredible feat of Max Spk, who managed to solve a 3X3 Rubik's Cube with one hand in just 468 seconds. This achievement raised eyebrows as it surpassed the then world record of 688 seconds. However, it was soon revealed that the scramble used for this record was actually incorrect. This brought into question the validity of the record achieved.

Smart Cubes and Record Legitimacy 🤨

A discussion ensued on whether records set using Smart Cubes should be considered legitimate. While some argued against the use of Smart Cubes due to the ease they offer, others identified impressive records, such as Han Wang's 273-second solve, achieved at the Championships in China. The debate continued, emphasizing the difference between Smart Cube solves and official stackmat solves used in competitions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the validity of records achieved using Smart Cubes remains a topic of debate within the speed cubing community. While they may not be comparable to official stackmat solves, they still hold value as unofficial records. Your thoughts on this matter are welcome in the comments section below! 🧩