Industrial Annihilation, the supposed successor to Total Annihilation? I've got my doubts. The track record of the developers is sketchy, with questionable decisions and failed Kickstarter campaigns. Now they're back with a new game and asking for more money. They even want you to invest directly in the company! It's a red flag parade. Do your research before jumping in. This feels like all the worst parts of modern Indie gaming rolled into one. I hope I'm wrong, but proceed with caution. 🚩
Summary
Table of Contents
Industrial Annihilation, touted as the spiritual successor to Total Annihilation and Planetary Annihilation, is making bold claims about redefining the RTS genre and offering infinite replayability. However, a closer look at the history of the developers raises some concerns about whether Industrial Annihilation will live up to its promises.
🔍 History Lesson: The Rise and Fall of Planetary Annihilation
Industrial Annihilation aims to build on the foundation of Planetary Annihilation, a game that achieved significant success but was not without its flaws. The game's innovative concept of incorporating multiple planets as RTS maps posed usability challenges, and the lack of unit variety made every game feel repetitive. The release of Titans, a standalone expansion, left many players dissatisfied, as it essentially abandoned the original version. This move sparked controversy and raised questions about the developers' decision-making.
####🔍 The Turbulent Journey of Star Theory
Industrial Annihilation's developers, under various names including Uber and Star Theory, have faced setbacks and controversies. Their previous attempts with Kickstarter and other projects, such as Human Resources and Kerbal Space Program 2, contributed to a loss of community trust. The closure of Star Theory after losing staff further adds to the questionable track record of the management team behind Industrial Annihilation.
🔍 Red Flags and Investment Risks
Financial Ambiguity: Industrial Annihilation's investment strategy through platforms like Start Engine raises concerns about transparency and the security of investors' funds. The lack of information about future returns and the portrayal of the game's market potential with exaggerated figures warrant caution.
Dubious Claims: The use of recycled content from previous games in Industrial Annihilation's promotional materials and inflated statements about the game's fan base cast doubt on the project's integrity.
Consumer Advice: Amidst the pre-orders, investments, and Early Access rollout plans, it's crucial for potential buyers to conduct thorough research and exercise prudence before committing to financial support for Industrial Annihilation.
🔍 Final Thoughts and Call to Action
The article serves as a call for cautious optimism and a reminder for consumers to be discerning in their gaming investments. While hoping for the success of Industrial Annihilation, the author emphasizes the importance of informed decision-making and encourages readers to delve deeper into the issues discussed.
Key Takeaways
| Concerns | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Track record of developers | Previous controversies and hasty decisions raise doubts about the developers' capabilities and trustworthiness. |
| Investment strategy | Lack of clarity regarding financial returns and the use of inflated market potential figures signal potential risks for investors. |
| Community caution | The need for thorough research and informed decision-making before supporting Industrial Annihilation is paramount. |
English 
Russian 
German