Jesus being described as a demon on the cross is as wild as dancing in a hurricane. This Paul Guillen guy must have had one too many cups of coffee. Jesus being depicted as a snake on a pole doesn't turn him into Mr. Slithers. It's about symbolism, not metamorphosis. Let's keep it real, folks! #biblialibre 🐍
Jesús como Demonio y Diablo
Table of Contents
🗣️ Introduction
Edgar Escobar of Biblia Libre engages in a discussion regarding a particular claim made by the controversial and popular post-modern apostle, Paul Guillen. Known as the follower of the famous preacher Hermosillo of the Hermosillo sect, Guillen makes an unprecedented and heretical statement that Jesus Christ transformed into a demon when crucified.
Demonic Transformation on the Cross
🔍 Explanation
Making reference to Numbers 21 in the Old Testament, the pastor Delgado claims that the metaphorical representation of Jesus as the serpent made of bronze reflects the salvation from sin. Clarifying this further with a testament to John 3:14, the convergence between the serpent and Jesus Christ becomes apparent, representing deliverance from the venom of sin.
📜 Jehovah instructed Moses to construct a bronze serpent as a testament to the salvation from the bites of venomous serpents.
Controversial Interpretations
🔥 Debate
The narrative unfolds around the interpretation of whether the bronze serpent should represent Satan or symbolize the sin for which Jesus paid the ultimate sacrifice. An intense debate arises regarding the significance of the bronze material, signifying the judgment of God, thereby asserting the purity of Christ.
Misinterpretation of Scripture
😞 Fallacious Arguments
Delgado's assertions trigger a critical analysis of scripture, such as Galatians 3:13, to discuss the redemptive act as the remission of sin rather than the transformation of Jesus into a malevolent being. The discussion also delves into the significance of the Greek word "hinom" and Paul's linguistic proficiency in interpreting the biblical narrative.
💡 Understanding Galatians 3:13 is crucial to debunking the fallacious ideas regarding Christ's nature.
Questionable Theological Conclusions
❓ Misrepresentations
Doubts arise about the logic of asserting that Jesus ceased to be divine during His crucifixion. A comprehensive re-examination of the discussions about the transformations and attributes of Christ is necessary to establish the truth and dispel these claims.
Erroneous Doctrines
🚫 Rebuttal
Refuting the assertion that Jesus took on a sinful nature, the discussion regarding 2 Corinthians 5:19 and other New Testament scriptures delves deep into Christ's divinity and unwavering commitment to reconciling humanity with God.
🤯 Disputing allegations of Jesus assuming sinful attributes.
Terrible Theology
👎 Debunking False Teachings
The conclusion highlights the severity of Guillen's error, positioning his teachings as theological heresies that undermine the fundamental tenets of Christianity.
Conclusively, Guillen's perspectives negate the essence of religious doctrines by misinterpreting scriptures to propagate baseless claims.
Thank you for being with us today in this enlightening discussion at Biblia Libre. Join the conversation in the comment section and share your thoughts!
English 
Russian 
German